← Glossary
Filing Basics

Summary Compensation Table (SCT)

The mandatory proxy table reporting each named executive officer’s pay by column.

The Summary Compensation Table is the standardized table in a U.S. public company’s proxy statement that reports each named executive officer’s compensation for the most recent fiscal year plus the two before it, broken into a fixed set of columns: salary, bonus, stock awards, option awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, the change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings, and all other compensation. Its Total column sums those columns for that officer and that year. The table reports the value of what was granted or earned in the year, not what an executive ultimately realized by vesting, exercising or selling.

The Summary Compensation Table is required by Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K in the proxy statement for every annual meeting at which directors are elected, which in practice means every U.S. public company publishes one every year. It covers only the named executive officers, the small group whose individual pay the company must disclose by name. Everything else in the proxy’s executive compensation section — the grants behind the awards, the equity still unvested, the amounts payable on a termination — is disclosed at that same individual level for that same group.

The table’s columns are fixed by rule and appear in the same order at every company: Salary, Bonus, Stock Awards, Option Awards, Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation, Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings, All Other Compensation, and Total. That standardization is the point. Because two companies fill the same columns under the same definitions, this is the one place in executive pay where a figure from one company can be set beside a figure from another without first checking what each company meant by a word like "bonus".

The Total column is the arithmetic sum of the other columns in that executive’s row for that fiscal year. It is the most frequently quoted number in press coverage, proxy adviser reports and shareholder proposals, which follows from the standardization rather than from any claim that the sum is the best single measure of pay. Each year is reported as its own row, so the table answers both what an executive was paid in the most recent year and how that figure has moved across the period shown.

The stock and option award columns report grant-date fair value under ASC 718 — an accounting value fixed on the day the award was made, based on the number of units or shares and the stock price that day. For an option, the value also reflects a pricing model’s estimate of volatility and term; for a performance award, the probability that the performance condition will be met. None of that is cash, and none of it changes when the stock price moves afterward.

The pension column behaves differently from the rest. It reports the actuarial change in the value of the executive’s pension benefits and above-market earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation during the year, and it can be negative when plan experience or the discount rate used to value the liability moves against the benefit. A negative figure there reduces the row’s total rather than being floored at zero.

Most filers show three completed fiscal years: the most recent year plus the two before it. Companies using the scaled disclosure available to smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies present two fiscal years instead. A company can also add or drop a named executive officer from one year to the next, so a row that appears in one proxy is not guaranteed to appear in the next.

Two limits are worth carrying into any reading of the table. It does not report realized value: an executive exercising options or selling vested shares is realizing awards made in earlier years, and that appears here only if a grant made in the current year happened to be reported at grant value. And the table is not the only pay number a proxy contains — the Pay Versus Performance disclosure reports Compensation Actually Paid for the same executives and years, and the director compensation table covers the board rather than management.

The footnotes are part of the disclosure rather than decoration. The components of all other compensation are itemized by type, the performance measures behind a non-equity incentive award are described, and any treatment the column heading does not make clear is explained there. Reading the columns without the footnotes is what produces most of the misreadings of this table.

How it works
  1. Identify the covered officers
    The table names the chief executive, the chief financial officer, and the other most highly compensated executive officers serving at the end of the fiscal year. Only those officers appear by name.
  2. Sort the year’s pay into the fixed columns
    Cash salary, any discretionary bonus, grant-date values for stock and option awards, cash earned under a pre-set incentive plan, the change in pension and deferred compensation value, and everything that fits no other column.
  3. Sum the row
    The Total column is the sum of the other columns for that executive and that fiscal year, with no cap and no offsetting adjustment beyond a negative pension figure.
  4. Repeat the row for the prior years
    The same executive and the same columns, for the two fiscal years before the most recent one, so the trend sits beside the level.
  5. Footnote the detail
    The components behind all other compensation, the performance measures behind an incentive award, and any treatment the column heading alone would not make clear.
In practice
The dollar columns of a Summary Compensation Table, shown as the table prints them.
Salary column
The fixed cash component for the year.
$3,000,000
Stock awards column
The grant-date value of equity awarded for the year.
$57,535,293
Non-equity incentive column
Cash earned against pre-set performance goals.
$12,000,000
All other compensation column
The items the table’s other named columns do not cover.
$1,759,518
Total compensation
The figure the table reports as the executive’s total for the year.
$74,294,811

Apple's Summary Compensation Table reports Tim Cook's fiscal 2025 total compensation at $74,294,811, the sum of every column the table prints for that year.

See AAPL’s full page →
Where it appears
The proxy statement’s "Executive Compensation" section
The table itself, followed by the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the grants and outstanding awards tables, and the amounts payable on termination or a change in control.
The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)
The compensation committee’s account of how it set each element of pay, which is where the reasoning behind a column figure is stated.
The "Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal Year" table
The individual grants behind the stock, option and non-equity incentive columns, with the underlying share amounts, exercise prices and target payouts.
The "Pay Versus Performance" table
Compensation Actually Paid for the same executives and years, reported beside the Summary Compensation Table total rather than instead of it.
SCT Total vs. Compensation Actually Paid

Both figures describe the same executive in the same fiscal year, but they measure that year’s pay at different moments.

Summary Compensation Table totalCompensation Actually Paid
What it measuresCompensation granted or earned during the year, at the value assigned when grantedThe same year’s compensation with the equity component restated for how the stock moved afterward
Equity treatmentGrant-date fair value under ASC 718Year-end fair value for awards still unvested, and vesting-date value for awards that vested during the year
Cash componentsSalary, bonus, non-equity incentive pay and all other compensation as earnedThe same cash components, carried through unchanged
Pension treatmentThe change in pension value is one of the columnsThe change in pension value is excluded
Where it appearsEvery public company’s annual proxy, and the older and more widely cited figureThe Pay Versus Performance table, required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K
What it is notNot the cash an executive received, and not the proceeds of any sale of sharesNot the market value of everything the executive still holds
Common misreadings
  • The Total column is often read as take-home pay, when it is a sum of values that includes equity which may never vest and a pension change received as no cash at all.
  • A stock or option award figure is often read as something the executive received that year, when it is the value assigned to the award on the day it was granted.
  • A year-over-year drop in a total is often read as a pay cut, when it far more often reflects a multi-year grant made in one of the two years being compared and not the other.
Frequently asked
What is the Summary Compensation Table?
It is the table in a U.S. public company’s annual proxy that reports each named executive officer’s compensation for the most recent fiscal year and the two before it, across a fixed set of columns, with a Total column that sums them. It is required by Item 402(c) of Regulation S-K and appears in essentially every public company’s proxy.
Is the Total column what the executive actually took home?
No. The total combines cash that was paid with the grant-date value of equity that may still be unvested, and at some companies with a change in the actuarial value of pension benefits that no one received as cash. What an executive realizes in a given year usually comes from awards granted in earlier years, and shows up when those awards vest or are exercised.
Why do stock and option awards count toward pay in a year the executive received no shares?
The table reports compensation when it is granted rather than when it is realized, and the accounting standard requires an award to be valued at grant. That convention is what lets every company fill the same column the same way. The trade-off is that the column measures the value assigned to the award, not the proceeds of it.
Is the Summary Compensation Table the same thing as Compensation Actually Paid?
No, they are two separate disclosures that appear in the same proxy. The table reports grant-date values; Compensation Actually Paid begins from that total and restates the equity component for the change in the stock’s value through the year. The two figures for the same executive and year routinely differ, and the difference is the stock’s own movement.
Why does the same executive’s total change so much from one year to the next?
It usually reflects the grant cycle rather than a pay decision: a multi-year equity award made in one year and not in the next moves the total sharply in both directions. A change in which officers are covered, or a negative pension figure, can move it as well. This is a general pattern, though the size of any single year’s move varies by company.
Related terms
✦
For informational purposes only. Not investment, legal, or compensation advice.  All companies · The Pay Desk · Methodology · Terms · Privacy