Median Employee Compensation
Median employee compensation is the total pay of the employee at the midpoint of a company’s workforce pay distribution — half the workforce earns more and half earns less. It is calculated on the same total-compensation basis as the Summary Compensation Table, and it is the figure the CEO pay ratio divides into.
Median employee compensation is the total pay of one employee — or of one employee selected from a group of substantially equivalent employees — sitting at the midpoint of a company’s pay distribution. Half the measured workforce earns more than that figure and half earns less. It is disclosed so that the chief executive’s pay can be stated against something, and it is the denominator of the CEO pay ratio under Dodd-Frank Section 953(b) and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.
The median is not the average, and the difference matters. The average is total payroll divided by headcount, so a small number of very highly paid employees pulls it upward. The median is positional: it identifies the middle of the distribution and is unaffected by how far above or below the midpoint the extremes sit. A company with a long upper tail of executive and specialist pay can have an average well above its median while reporting the same workforce.
The rule does not prescribe a single way to find the median. A company may rank the total compensation of its entire measured population and take the middle, apply a statistical sampling method, or use another reasonable approach, and it must describe the method and its assumptions in the proxy. Where the population produces several employees at the same point, the rule permits the company to identify a group of employees whose compensation is substantially equivalent and select one of them as the median employee.
What the population includes is a company choice the proxy has to state. The rule permits a de minimis exclusion of non-U.S. employees, allows part-time, seasonal and temporary employees to be covered by specified adjustments rather than measured on the same footing as full-time, full-year staff, and allows pay to be annualized for permanent employees hired partway through the year. Cost-of-living adjustments are also permitted when employees in different jurisdictions are measured together. The population is tied to people the company employs, so independent contractors and workers engaged through a staffing agency generally sit outside it.
The measurement basis is deliberately aligned with the executive disclosure. The median employee’s pay is totaled using the same methodology the Summary Compensation Table applies to named executive officers — salary, incentive compensation, the grant-date fair value of equity awards, and other compensation. That is why the disclosed figure can look unlike what the employee received in cash during the year: equity is counted at the value assigned when it was granted, not when it vested or was sold.
A company does not have to identify a new median employee every year. The rule permits the same median employee to be used for up to three years, provided there has been no significant change in the employee population or in employee compensation arrangements. A large acquisition or divestiture, a restructuring, or a broad change in how the workforce is composed requires a fresh identification sooner — which is one reason the figure can move for reasons that have nothing to do with anyone’s pay changing.
The number is a property of the workforce as much as of the pay program. A company that employs a large share of its people in part-time, seasonal or entry-level roles will show a lower median than a company in the same industry whose comparable work is done by contractors or by a franchised or outsourced workforce, even where the pay for equivalent jobs is the same. Reading the figure against the company’s own headcount, geography and business model is what makes it interpretable; reading it across companies without that context does not.
The figure also says nothing about how pay is spread above and below the midpoint. Two companies can report the same median while their distributions differ substantially at every other point, and a rising median does not show that individual employees received raises — it can reflect a different population, a different determination date, a different measurement method, or the selection of a different individual from a substantially equivalent group.
- Define the populationThe company sets the employee population it will measure, stating whether part-time, seasonal, temporary and non-U.S. employees are included, adjusted for, or excluded under the rule’s limited allowance.
- Total compensation for the populationPay for each measured employee is totaled on the same basis the Summary Compensation Table uses — salary, incentive pay, equity grant-date value and other compensation.
- Find the midpointThe company ranks the population, or applies a permitted sampling method, to reach the employee whose compensation sits at the middle.
- Select the median employeeWhere the population leaves a group of employees at substantially equivalent compensation, the company selects one of them, and states that it did so.
- Decide on reuseThe same median employee may be used for up to three years absent a significant change in the population or in compensation arrangements; a significant change requires identifying a new one.
- Disclose with the ratioThe median employee’s annual total compensation appears alongside the chief executive’s total and the resulting ratio, with the methodology described in the proxy.
Median employee compensation The pay of the one employee identified as the median. | $12,939 |
CEO total compensation The other figure the ratio is built from. | $44,391,138 |
Pay ratio The ratio itself, as the company discloses it. | 3,431:1 |
Flex's identified median employee earned $12,939 in total compensation for fiscal 2026, the denominator behind its pay ratio disclosure.
See FLEX’s full page →- CEO pay ratio disclosure in the proxy statement
- The median employee’s annual total compensation, stated next to the chief executive’s total and the ratio the two produce.
- Methodology narrative accompanying the pay ratio
- How the median employee was identified, any annualization or cost-of-living adjustments applied, and any permitted exclusions from the population.
- Summary Compensation Table
- The total-compensation methodology the median employee’s figure is modeled on, even though that employee is not a named executive officer.
Both figures describe a workforce’s pay from a single number, but they answer different questions and respond differently to the extremes of a distribution.
| Median | Average (mean) | |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | The pay of the employee at the midpoint, with half the workforce above and half below | Total pay of the workforce divided by the number of employees |
| Sensitivity to extremes | Unaffected by how far the highest and lowest earners sit from the middle | Pulled upward by even a small number of very highly paid employees |
| What it describes | What a typical employee earns | What each employee would earn if total pay were spread evenly |
| Role in disclosure | The figure the CEO pay ratio is built on | Not the figure the pay ratio uses, though it can appear in other pay analysis |
| What it leaves out | The spread of pay above and below the midpoint | The shape of the distribution that produced it |
| In a workforce with a long upper tail | Generally sits lower than the average | Generally sits higher than the median |
- Median employee compensation is not a minimum or a floor: it is the midpoint, and a substantial part of the workforce earns less than it.
- It is not average pay. The average is pulled upward by the highest earners, so the two figures diverge most at companies with a long upper tail of pay.
- A lower median does not by itself mean a company pays less for the same work: the figure is also shaped by how much of the workforce is part-time, seasonal or based in lower-cost locations.
- CEO Pay RatioThe disclosure that divides the chief executive’s total compensation by the median employee’s figure.
- Summary Compensation Table (SCT)The mandatory proxy table whose total-compensation methodology the median employee’s figure is calculated on.
- Named Executive Officer (NEO)An officer whose individual pay a company must disclose by name in its proxy — the group the median employee’s pay is deliberately not part of.
- Compensation Peer GroupThe set of companies a board benchmarks its own executive pay against, a different comparison from the internal one the median employee figure provides.